This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hipp, S S Articles by Murphy, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hipp, S S Articles by Murphy, D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 October; 25(10): 1938-1943

Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

S S Hipp, Y Han and D Murphy

Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany 12201.

ABSTRACT

Two rapid diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis (Microtrak, Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.; and Chlamydiazyme, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) were evaluated in comparison with growth of the organism in tissue culture for 2,030 urogenital specimens from men and women. Neither test performed as well as culture, which detected 296 of 310 positive specimens. The overall sensitivity and specificity for Microtrak were 73 and 99%; corresponding values for Chlamydiazyme were 83 and 98%. The majority of false-negative results with both rapid tests occurred when cultures contained less than 10 inclusions per cover slip. There were also areas of unconfirmed reactivity for both tests that led us to suggest that a reporting category of "suspicious" be developed for certain test results. For Microtrak, the suspicious result is a slide containing fewer than 10 elementary bodies; for Chlamydiazyme, it is any absorbance reading less than 0.4. Creation of a "suspicious" category would lower the sensitivity for Chlamydiazyme considerably, to 64%, and increase the positive predictive value for females to 95%. Although this may result in the underreading of some specimens from males, the tests could then be used with greater confidence in females for whom testing is essential for appropriate treatment.

---

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 October; 25(10): 1938-1943

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kellogg, J. A., Vanderhoff, B. T., Seiple, J. W., Hick, M. E. (1994). Comparison of First-Voided Urine Specimens With Endocervical Swab Specimens for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Women. Arch Fam Med 3: 672-675 [Abstract]  
• Hedrum, A, Lundeberg, J, Pahlson, C, Uhlen, M (1992). Immunomagnetic recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urine with subsequent colorimetric DNA detection.. Genome Res 2: 167-171 [Abstract]