This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moyer, N P Articles by Hausler, W J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moyer, N P Articles by Hausler, W J, Jr

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 November; 25(11): 2049-2053

Evaluation of MUREX SUDS Toxo test.

Hygienic Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

ABSTRACT

The SUDS Toxo test (MUREX Corp., Norcross, Ga.) was compared with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA) and the indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFA) by examining 404 serum specimens, including 64 (15.8%) specimens with IFA titers of greater than or equal to 1:2. When SUDS was compared with IHA, sensitivity (96.4%), specificity (97.9%), and negative predictive value (99.4%) indicated that there were similar reactivities between the two tests. When an IFA titer of greater than or equal to 1:16 was considered significant and IHA and SUDS were compared with IFA, IHA was slightly less sensitive but had a higher positive predictive value than did SUDS; however, there was no statistical difference between the tests. When SUDS was compared with IFA, in which a titer of greater than or equal to 1:16 was considered significant, the high negative predictive value (100%), excellent sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.3%), and ease of performance made SUDS an attractive alternative to IHA for screening single serum specimens for toxoplasmosis.