JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devlin, H R
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, W C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devlin, H R
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, W C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 November; 25(11): 2168-2172

Restriction endonuclease analysis of nosocomial isolates of Clostridium difficile.

H R Devlin, W Au, L Foux and W C Bradbury

Department of Microbiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ABSTRACT

A total of 110 clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis by using both bacterial restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and plasmid profiles. A total of 72 isolates were divided into 12 groups according to their REA patterns. Some 38 isolates exhibited unique patterns. Pattern A occurred in 20% of isolates. Isolates with patterns B, E, and G were cytotoxin negative. The remaining groups were cytotoxin positive. Multiple isolates obtained from two stool specimens were studied to examine the variation in REA profiles found in single specimens. In these specimens no variation in REA profiles was found. The stability of C. difficile was studied by examining sequential in vitro subcultures of a single isolate and strains isolated over a 4-month period from two long-term carriers. REA patterns were stable over time, both in vitro and in vivo. Because plasmid DNA was observed in 53% of isolates, plasmid profiles alone could not be used to study the spread of C. difficile; however, they were necessary for the interpretation of REA patterns in some instances.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 November; 25(11): 2168-2172




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.