This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sautter, R L Articles by Denys, G A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sautter, R L Articles by Denys, G A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 February; 25(2): 301-304

Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems.

ABSTRACT

The BIOGRAM (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) system, which is designed to calculate MICs from disk diffusion zone diameters, was compared with two commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility systems. A total of 111 clinical isolates were evaluated with each test system. Six additional isolates were tested in a comparison between BIOGRAM and Sceptor (Johnston Laboratories, Inc. Towson, Md.) systems. BIOGRAM demonstrated an overall correlation with the Sceptor microdilution method of 95.7% for 1,287 organism-antimicrobial susceptibility combinations. The BIOGRAM and UniScept (Analytab Products, Inc., Plainview, N.Y.) systems were in agreement in 90.3% of 1,048 organism-antimicrobial susceptibility combinations tested. All methicillin-resistant staphylococci were detected by the standard disk agar diffusion method used with the BIOGRAM system. The BIOGRAM system provides an acceptable alternative to these commercial systems for the determination of quantitative susceptibility.