JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinhardt, J F
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, P H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reinhardt, J F
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, P H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 April; 25(4): 719-721

Comparison of blood culture methods for recovery of Legionella pneumophila from the blood of guinea pigs with experimental infection.

J F Reinhardt, C Nakahama and P H Edelstein

ABSTRACT

Blood was cultured from guinea pigs with experimental Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 pneumonia, using four different methods. A 0.03-ml amount was spread onto each of several plates of buffered charcoal-yeast extract supplemented with alpha-ketoglutarate (BCYE) (direct plate); 1.5 ml each was inoculated into a BCYE agar-yeast extract broth bottle (biphasic), a pediatric Isolator tube (E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.), and a glass tube containing 0.025% sodium polyanethanolsulfonate. Blood processed in the Isolator tube was plated on BCYE, as was the buffy coat blood fraction, which was obtained by centrifugation of the tube containing sodium polyanethanolsulfonate and blood. Observations were made of the number of positive cultures, the time to detection of positive cultures, and the absolute bacterial concentrations. Each system was equally sensitive in detecting bacteremia. The biphasic method required 5 days for cultures to become positive, whereas the other systems required 2 to 3 days to detect all positive cultures (P = 1.3 X 10(-5) by Friedman group statistic, and P less than 10(-5) for comparison of the biphasic and other methods). The direct plating method demonstrated the best quantitative recovery of L. pneumophila in comparison to the other methods tested (P = 2.0 X 10(-5) by analysis of variance group statistic and P less than 0.05 for comparison between each of the methods). Quantitative recovery by the Isolator method was intermediate between the direct plating and buffy coat methods. The biphasic and Isolator blood culture methods performed poorly in comparison to the other methods, indicating the need for caution in choosing blood culture methods for Legionella isolation.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 April; 25(4): 719-721







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.