JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burdash, N M
Right arrow Articles by Manos, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burdash, N M
Right arrow Articles by Manos, J P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May; 25(5): 808-811

Evaluation of the syphilis Bio-EnzaBead assay for detection of treponemal antibody.

N M Burdash, K K Hinds, J A Finnerty and J P Manos

ABSTRACT

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Treponema pallidum antibody (Syphilis Bio-EnzaBead Kit; Organon Teknika Corp., formerly Litton Bionetics, Kensington, Md.) was compared with the standard fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for syphilis (indirect fluorescent-antibody confirmatory test; Zeus Scientific Inc., Raritan, N.J.). Six hundred specimens tested in the rapid plasma Reagin card test (Hynson, Westcott and Dunning, Inc., Baltimore, Md.) and microhemagglutination assay for antibodies to T. pallidum (Ames Division, Miles Laboratories, Inc., Elkhart, Ind.) were used for comparison testing. One hundred and sixty-two specimens were from either persons with syphilis or persons whose history was unknown but who showed reactive serology, whereas 438 were from persons without syphilis. The reactivity of each serum by the Bio-EnzaBead test was determined visually and from optical density readings. Excellent reproducibility of visual readings was obtained; all results were within +/- 1 gradation of the expected readings in all 60 coded sera tested. Overall agreement between the Bio-EnzaBead and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test results was 96.3% when read visually and greater than or equal to 95.7% when using optical density readings. Our data indicate that Bio-EnzaBead results read at 405 nm and determined by using the mean antigen optical density reading of the nonreactive control plus 0.025 as the cutoff value provide an overall sensitivity and specificity of 93.0 and 98.6%, respectively, along with the best agreement with the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption assay. Ease of performance and objectivity also contribute toward the acceptability of this assay as an alternative confirmatory test for syphilis.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May; 25(5): 808-811




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.