JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, R B
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, R B, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May; 25(5): 819-823

Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.

R B Thomson Jr, T M File Jr, J S Tan and B L Evans

ABSTRACT

A blood culture was performed by adding a vented Septi-Chek bottle (Roche Diagnostics, Div. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, N.J.) to a standard BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.) blood culture. The yield of bacteremic patients, the clinical significance of organisms detected, and the cost of the combination system were compared with those of the standard BACTEC system alone. Each culture included 20 ml of blood divided among a BACTEC 6B aerobic bottle (5 ml), a BACTEC 7D anaerobic bottle (5 ml), and a Septi-Chek bottle equipped with a slide subculture attachment (10 ml). Significant isolates grew in 9.6% of the 2,269 cultures evaluated. The combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek system detected 25% more bacteremic patients than the BACTEC system alone, 129 patients versus 103. The 26 bacteremic patients detected by only the added Septi-Chek bottle included 7 whose organism was isolated from blood alone and 19 whose organism was in mixed or pure culture from a second source. Detection of the organism resulted in alteration of antimicrobial therapy in 17 of these 26 patients. The combination system, which cultured a 20-ml blood volume, cost $11,000 more during the study period than the BACTEC system alone, which cultured a 10-ml volume. Reimbursement under the diagnosis-related group system was increased by $23,000 as a result of documentation of sepsis in these 26 patients. Blood volume and, possibly, the use of multiple blood culture systems are important factors when selecting a blood culture procedure for routine use.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May; 25(5): 819-823







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.