JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, T A
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, D A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, T A
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, D A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 August; 25(8): 1442-1445

Rapid identification of Mycobacterium avium complex in culture using DNA probes.

T A Drake, J A Hindler, O G Berlin and D A Bruckner

ABSTRACT

A commercial DNA probe procedure for identification of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates was evaluated for accuracy and applicability for use in the clinical laboratory. The test (Gen-Probe Rapid Diagnostic System for Mycobacterium Avium Complex; Gen-Probe Corp., San Diego, Calif.) uses hybridization in solution of two 125I-labeled cDNA probes. One probe is complementary to rRNA from M. avium, and the other is complementary to rRNA from M. intracellulare. Results are expressed as absolute percent hybridization, with values greater than or equal to 10% considered positive. The procedure accurately identified all 134 M. avium complex isolates and concomitantly identified them to species level. There were no false-positives with 66 other mycobacteria, including 22 M. tuberculosis and 18 M. kansasii isolates, or with 8 Nocardia isolates. The mean percent hybridization (+/- the standard deviation) of M. avium probe-positive isolates (94 isolates) was 48.0 +/- 9.9 (range, 11.5 to 72.7); for M. intracellulare (40 isolates), it was 45.7 +/- 8.8 (range, 22.7 to 60.7). Among the 74 non-M. avium complex isolates, the percent hybridization range was 1.0 to 4.2, except for a single value of 9.7 which was less than 5 when the test was repeated. Four M. avium complex isolates reacted positively with both probes on initial testing, and three were confirmed. On repeat testing of subcultures, each reacted with only one probe, suggesting the presence of a mixed culture. The procedure can be completed in as little as 2 h and could easily be performed in most clinical laboratories.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 August; 25(8): 1442-1445




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.