JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G V
Right arrow Articles by Tubert, T A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G V
Right arrow Articles by Tubert, T A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 August; 25(8): 1453-1455

In vitro chloramphenicol susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: disk diffusion procedures and assays for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

G V Doern, G S Daum and T A Tubert

ABSTRACT

The activity of chloramphenicol against 100 different strains of Haemophilus influenzae was assessed by a macrotube broth dilution technique and by a standardized disk diffusion method using both enriched chocolate agar (CHOC) and Mueller-Hinton agar containing 1.0% hemoglobin and 1.0% IsoVitaleX (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplement (CHOC-MHA). Filter disks containing 30 micrograms of chloramphenicol were used with the disk diffusion procedure. The following zone diameter interpretive criteria were defined: CHOC-MHA, less than or equal to 25 mm = resistant [corrected] and greater than or equal to 26 mm = susceptible [corrected]; CHOC, less than or equal to 28 mm = resistant [corrected] and greater than or equal to 29 mm = susceptible [corrected]. all of the H. influenzae strains examined were also characterized by using two rapid assays for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity: a 1-h tube method (t-CAT) and a 30-min procedure which used commercially available reagent-impregnated disks (d-CAT). The t-CAT procedure was found to be significantly more accurate than the d-CAT procedure as a means for demonstrating production of CAT.


J Clin Microbiol. 1987 August; 25(8): 1453-1455







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.