This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mulligan, M E Articles by Gerding, D N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mulligan, M E Articles by Gerding, D N

Immunoblots and plasmid fingerprints compared with serotyping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile.

Medical Service, West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, California 90073.

ABSTRACT

Two new methods for typing Clostridium difficile, immunoblotting and plasmid fingerprinting, were compared with serotyping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Of these methods, immunoblotting was found to be the most valuable for use in a comprehensive typing system. More groups could be distinguished by immunoblotting than by serotyping or PAGE. Immunoblotting results were also more reproducible and distinctive than results by PAGE. Plasmid fingerprinting was an excellent marker for plasmid-bearing strains, but it had limited use because many isolates lacked plasmids. A unique plasmid profile observed for one group of isolates correlated with differences in phenotypic characteristics resolved by immunoblot analysis but not by serotyping or PAGE. Preliminary attempts to correlate typing results with pathogenicity of isolates were not successful but underscored the need for future studies to include careful assessment of the clinical significance of isolates.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Akerlund, T., Svenungsson, B., Lagergren, A., Burman, L. G. (2006). Correlation of Disease Severity with Fecal Toxin Levels in Patients with Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea and Distribution of PCR Ribotypes and Toxin Yields In Vitro of Corresponding Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 353-358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rupnik, M., Brazier, J. S., Duerden, B. I., Grabnar, M., Stubbs, S. L. J. (2001). Comparison of toxinotyping and PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile strains and description of novel toxinotypes. Microbiology 147: 439-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stubbs, S. L. J., Brazier, J. S., O'Neill, G. L., Duerden, B. I. (1999). PCR Targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Intergenic Spacer Region of Clostridium difficile and Construction of a Library Consisting of 116 Different PCR Ribotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 461-463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tabaqchali, S., Jumaa, P. (1995). Fortnightly Review: Diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile infection. BMJ 310: 1375-1380 [Abstract] [Full Text]