JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J I
Right arrow Articles by Vella, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J I
Right arrow Articles by Vella, P
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 January; 26(1): 72-78

Variable quantitation of Haemophilus influenzae type b anticapsular antibody by radioantigen binding assay.

J I Ward, D P Greenberg, P W Anderson, K S Burkart, P D Christenson, L K Gordon, H Kayhty, J S Kuo and P Vella

Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance 90509.

ABSTRACT

The measurement of antibody to Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide is important in the study of natural immunity and in the immunogenicity evaluation of H. influenzae type b vaccines. Several radioantigen binding assays (RABA) have been developed to measure H. influenzae type b anticapsular antibody, but recent immunogenicity data obtained with structurally similar vaccines suggest major differences in antibody quantitation in different laboratories. To evaluate interlaboratory variability in the measurement of anticapsular antibody levels, we blindly evaluated a sample of 40 pre- and postimmunization sera by eight RABAs in different laboratories. Evaluation of RABA methods revealed differences in polysaccharide antigens, radiolabeling methods, concentration and volume of antigen and antibody, and other assay methods. The reported results of assays varied significantly between laboratories (up to sixfold differences in geometric means), in part because of differences in assay sensitivity and different proportions of samples having undetectable levels of antibody (0 to 65% of specimens with undetectable levels). After standardizing the limit of sensitivity for all assays (0.125 microgram/ml), the results of all combinations of paired analyses of RABA assays correlated well (r = 0.88 to 0.99) but the geometric mean levels still varied as much as twofold. For individual sera, the differences between paired assays often were substantial (P less than or equal to 0.0001, paired t test), with some results varying as much as 64-fold. Differences were greatest for lower levels of antibody. There was good comparability and interlaboratory reproducibility of some assays but not of others. Intrinsic or extrinsic labeling of the antigen was not a major determinant of comparability. In most instances, the current variation in the quantitation of antibody levels by these assays precludes interassay comparisons. A standardized measurement of antibody needs to be developed to adequately compare results between different H. influenzae type b immunogenicity studies.


J Clin Microbiol. 1988 January; 26(1): 72-78




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.