This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baron, E J Articles by Berman, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baron, E J Articles by Berman, M

Visual and clinical analysis of Bac-T-Screen urine screen results.

North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York 11030.

ABSTRACT

Of 337 urine specimens evaluated, 75 of the 113 that showed positive readings on the Bac-T-Screen urine-screening instrument were found by subsequent semiquantitative culture to yield either less than 10,000 CFU of mixed bacteria per ml or no growth (less than 100 CFU/ml by our criteria). We tried to determine what factors contributed to the positive Bac-T-Screen results by examining the 75 Bac-T-Screen-positive urine specimens with three visual methods: Gram staining, hemacytometer chamber counting, and filtering through a 5.0-microns-pore-size nitrocellulose filter with subsequent microscopic examination of the stained filter. Somatic cells and other particles present in those urine specimens that yielded positive readings by the Bac-T-Screen included epithelial cells in 43%, crystals and amorphous material in 33%, and leukocytes in 17% of the specimens. There was no relationship between the numbers of particles seen in urine and the magnitude of the relative absorbance reading obtained with the Bac-T-Screen. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with positive Bac-T-Screen results and negative cultures. Of the 75 patients, 6 were thought to have urinary tract infections on the basis of clinical criteria; the majority of the remaining 69 patients had clinical histories revealing systemic or urogenital conditions consistent with shedding of particles in the urine. A positive reading by the Bac-T-Screen system seemed to be related to the presence of somatic cells and other particles in urine; bacteriuria was not always detectable in these cases.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Anderson, M., Bollinger, D., Hagler, A., Hartwell, H., Rivers, B., Ward, K., Steck, T. R. (2004). Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria Are Present in Mouse and Human Urine Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 753-758 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cardoso, C. L., Muraro, C. B., Siqueira, V. L. D., Guilhermetti, M. (1998). Simplified Technique for Detection of Significant Bacteriuria by Microscopic Examination of Urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 820-823 [Abstract] [Full Text]