This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Hara, C M Articles by Schable, B A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Hara, C M Articles by Schable, B A

Evaluation of the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae screen system.

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta.

ABSTRACT

A total of 932 typical and atypical enteric fermenters were used to evaluate the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae Screen/Identification System. At 4 h, final identifications were available for only 13.3%, but an additional 71% were screened into the correct group, according to the product's database. At 24 h, 58.8% were correctly identified to the species level, often with the use of an additional tube. When 118 of the cultures were arranged into a weighted assortment, as might be found in a clinical laboratory, 35 were definitively identified at 4 h, and another 72 were screened into the correct group. Of these 72, 31 were correctly identified to the species level at 24 h, for a total of 56.0%. False-negative ornithine and incorrect L-pyrrolidonyl-beta-naphthylamide and glucuronide xylopyranoside reactions accounted for 54% of the identification errors, while database problems accounted for 10.2% of the errors. Of the eight Salmonella paratyphi A cultures, seven were missed because of a false-positive lysine reaction. At best, the system serves only as a rough screen.