JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, A J
Right arrow Articles by Gill, D E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, A J
Right arrow Articles by Gill, D E
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 February; 26(2): 347-353

Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reversed passive hemagglutination for detection of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus antigen.

A J Shepherd, R Swanepoel and D E Gill

Department of Virology, University of the Witwatersrand, Republic of South Africa.

ABSTRACT

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a reversed passive hemagglutination (RPHA) test were evaluated for rapid detection of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus antigens. Both RPHA and ELISA detected CCHF antigen in the brains of infant mice 2 to 3 days after infection, several days before the animals sickened and died. Antigen was also detected after 1 to 2 days in infected cell culture extracts and after 2 to 4 days in culture supernatant fluids. Both tests detected CCHF antigen at threshold values of approximately 2.5 log10 tissue culture infective doses per ml and were more sensitive than complement fixation, immunodiffusion, or immunofluorescence. In a comparative study on specimens from CCHF patients, virus was isolated from 38 of 49 sera and 23 of 28 patients. Antigen was detected in 20 of 49 sera (15 of 28 patients) by RPHA and in 29 of 49 sera (18 of 28 patients) by ELISA. Antigenemia was detected more frequently in fatal cases (9 of 11) than in nonfatal cases (9 of 17). Although the antigen detection assays offered a more rapid approach than infectivity assays for diagnosing CCHF, the latter test was more sensitive. The results suggest that RPHA and ELISA may be of use in rapid diagnosis of CCHF infection, particularly in severe cases, in which the danger of nosocomial spread is greatest.


J Clin Microbiol. 1988 February; 26(2): 347-353




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.