This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lefebvre, J Articles by Massé, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lefebvre, J Articles by Massé, R

Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Laboratoire de santé publique de Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Culture in DEAE-dextran-treated HeLa 229 cells, a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Chlamydiazyme; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.), and a direct immunofluorescence test (DFA) (MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.) were compared for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from 715 asymptomatic women. Response to antibiotic therapy was also monitored at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. An additional sample was collected at a control visit, and a second culture was performed if discrepancies were observed between the three tests. A total of 48 infections were diagnosed, for a prevalence of 6.7%. At the first visit, 37 specimens were positive by culture. The respective sensitivities of EIA and DFA were 78.4 and 81.1% and the respective specificities were 96.8 and 97.9% when compared with the cell culture technique. The positive predictive values were 56.9 and 68.2%, respectively. When the additional 11 infections detected by the second culture were included to establish a new standard of positivity, the sensitivity of the first culture was estimated at 77.1%. The positive predictive values of EIA and DFA increased to 77.6 and 83.7%, respectively. EIA and DFA performed as well as culture for control of therapy; a 100% agreement among the three techniques was observed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Black, C. M., Marrazzo, J., Johnson, R. E., Hook III, E. W., Jones, R. B., Green, T. A., Schachter, J., Stamm, W. E., Bolan, G., St. Louis, M. E., Martin, D. H. (2002). Head-to-Head Multicenter Comparison of DNA Probe and Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women Performed with an Improved Reference Standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3757-3763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Biro, F. M., Rosenthal, S. L., Kiniyalocts, M. (1995). Gonococcal and Chlamydial Genitourinary Infections in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Adolescent Women. CLIN PEDIATR 34: 419-423 [Abstract]  
• Hedrum, A, Lundeberg, J, Pahlson, C, Uhlen, M (1992). Immunomagnetic recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urine with subsequent colorimetric DNA detection.. Genome Res. 2: 167-171 [Abstract]