This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sorbello, A F Articles by Echols, R M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sorbello, A F Articles by Echols, R M

Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus by fluorescent monoclonal antibody staining and in situ DNA hybridization in a dram vial cell culture system.

Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, New York 12208.

ABSTRACT

By using dram vial cell culture methods, three commercially available tests for cytomegalovirus (CMV) detection were compared: direct fluorescent monoclonal antibody staining for CMV-specific early and late antigens (direct FA), indirect fluorescent monoclonal antibody staining for a CMV-specific early antigen (indirect FA), and in situ DNA hybridization with a biotinylated CMV-specific DNA probe kit (DNA probe). Of those tests, only the indirect FA provided consistent, reliable virus detection within the initial 24 h postinfection for serial 10-fold dilutions of CMV AD169 (laboratory strain) and for three selected urine samples. However, when used prospectively, the indirect FA failed to detect virus within the initial 10 days postinfection in 15 of 78 consecutive specimens that were eventually positive by cell culture. Although the indirect FA was more sensitive than the direct FA or DNA probe, its utility appeared limited to specimens with high CMV concentrations. On the basis of these data, we recommend that indirect FA be reserved as an adjunct to standard cell culture for selected samples in diagnostic hospital laboratories.