JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, H P
Right arrow Articles by Quint, W G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, H P
Right arrow Articles by Quint, W G
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 July; 26(7): 1313-1315

Immunological detection of cytomegalovirus early antigen on monolayers inoculated with urine specimens by centrifugation and cultured for 6 days as alternative to conventional virus isolation.

H P Janssen, A M van Loon, M J Meddens, E C Eickmans-Josten, A J Hoitsma, T J de Witte and W G Quint

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

Detection methods for human cytomegalovirus were evaluated with 431 urine samples from 30 bone marrow and 88 kidney transplant recipients. Low-speed centrifugal inoculation was followed by early antigen (EA) detection by means of indirect immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody after 1 (EA-1) and 6 (EA-6) days of cultivation. The results were compared with those of conventional virus isolation (CVI). Of 68 positive samples, 49 (72%) were detected with EA-1, 58 (85%) were detected with EA-6, and 43 (63%) were detected with CVI. The combination of EA-1 and EA-6 showed positive results with 66 samples (97%), which is significantly better than with CVI (P less than 0.001). With the exception of one patient, all CVI-negative but EA-positive samples had either significant rises in immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgA antibody titer or IgM antibodies present in the sera. These data indicate that the method with EA detection can replace CVI, provided that each sample is inoculated in duplicate. Sample 1 is examined after 1 day, and if it is negative, sample 2 is incubated for a further 5 days, followed by detection of cytomegalovirus.


J Clin Microbiol. 1988 July; 26(7): 1313-1315







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.