JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, S
Right arrow Articles by Pennell, D R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, S
Right arrow Articles by Pennell, D R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1988 July; 26(7): 1378-1382

Rapid method for the differentiation of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria on membrane filters.

S Romero, R F Schell and D R Pennell

Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

ABSTRACT

Microfiltration has become a popular procedure for the concentration and enumeration of bacteria. We developed a rapid and sensitive method for the differentiation of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, utilizing a polycarbonate membrane filter, crystal violet, iodine, 95% ethanol, and 6% carbol fuchsin, that can be completed in 60 to 90 s. Gram reactions of 49 species belonging to 30 genera of bacteria were correctly determined by the filter-Gram stain. The sensitivities of the filter-Gram stain and conventional slide-Gram stain were compared by testing dilutions of Escherichia coli, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae suspensions in the presence and absence of whole human blood. The filter-Gram stain was approximately 100-fold more sensitive than the slide-Gram stain. The filter-Gram stain detected 2 to 100 bacteria, whereas the slide-Gram stain failed to detect less than 1,000 bacteria. The sensitivities of the methods were not significantly altered by the addition of whole human blood to the dilutions of bacteria tested. The filter-Gram stain could be a useful tool for the examination of body fluids with very low numbers of bacteria.


J Clin Microbiol. 1988 July; 26(7): 1378-1382




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.