This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Witebsky, F G Articles by Siddiqi, S H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Witebsky, F G Articles by Siddiqi, S H

Comparison of BACTEC 13A medium and Du Pont isolator for detection of mycobacteremia.

Clinical Pathology Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

ABSTRACT

BACTEC 13A medium (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) was compared with Isolator (Du Pont Co., Wilmington, Del.) concentrate for sensitivity, speed, and technical ease of isolation of mycobacteria from paired patient blood samples. Of 72 positive cultures, 63 were positive by both systems. Five positive cultures were detected by BACTEC 13A medium alone, and four were detected by Isolator alone. The median numbers of days to positivity were 12 for BACTEC 13A medium and 14 for Isolator concentrate. BACTEC 13A medium has an advantage over the Isolator in requiring less laboratory manipulation of the specimen but has the disadvantages of not providing isolated colonies or quantitation of organisms. Some technical problems with contamination in both systems are also discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Esteban, J., Molleja, A., Fernández-Roblas, R., Soriano, F. (1998). Number of Days Required for Recovery of Mycobacteria from Blood and Other Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1456-1457 [Abstract] [Full Text]