JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Correction for Sanders and Cavalieri, J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 (4) 830-831.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P C
Right arrow Articles by Barry, A L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P C
Right arrow Articles by Barry, A L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 November; 27(11): 2475-2481

Reassessment of susceptibility test interpretive criteria for ticarcillin and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid.

P C Fuchs, R N Jones and A L Barry

St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97225.

ABSTRACT

There are at least four different existing or proposed interpretive criteria for the disk diffusion susceptibility testing of ticarcillin and ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid (T/C). To assess these criteria, 570 gram-negative bacillary isolates were tested for susceptibility to ticarcillin and T/C by both disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. These included 53 strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae selected for ticarcillin resistance and high-level beta-lactamase production. The broth microdilution test results were more influenced by increased beta-lactamase production than were disk diffusion results. In the absence of published data indicating which of the two standardized test methods better predicts clinical response, we conclude that until such data are available the more conservative National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards tentative criteria for tests with members of the Enterobacteriaceae are appropriate. Our data do not support the use of separate T/C interpretive criteria for Pseudomonas spp. and members of the Enterobacteriaceae. The appropriateness of different interpretive criteria needs further evaluation.


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 November; 27(11): 2475-2481







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.