JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, H
Right arrow Articles by Rossier, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, H
Right arrow Articles by Rossier, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 December; 27(12): 2672-2677

Comparison of immunoblotting with other serological methods and virus isolation for the early detection of primary cytomegalovirus infection in allograft recipients.

H Miller, B McCulloch, M P Landini and E Rossier

Regional Virology Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Sequential specimens from nine allograft recipients were examined by using a variety of methods to detect primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as rapidly as possible posttransplantation. Sera were examined for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies by immunoblotting, enzyme immunoassay, and immunofluorescence and also by complement fixation, latex agglutination, and an immunofluorescence test for antibody to CMV early antigen. Urine and occasionally blood, tissue, and other specimens were centrifuged onto cell cultures to enhance CMV infectivity. Eight of the nine patients showed laboratory evidence of primary CMV infection, and CMV was isolated from seven of the eight: in no case was virus isolated before seroconversion had become evident. However, serological tests differed in their abilities to detect antibody response to CMV infection in different patients; while immunoblotting, latex agglutination, and enzyme immunoassay for IgG antibodies generally detected seroconversion before complement fixation, this was not invariably the case. At present, optimal laboratory detection of CMV infections in these patients can be achieved only by a combination of serological methods and virus isolation.


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 December; 27(12): 2672-2677







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.