This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Janoff, E N Articles by Reller, L B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Janoff, E N Articles by Reller, L B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 March; 27(3): 431-435

Diagnosis of Giardia lamblia infections by detection of parasite-specific antigens.

Infectious Disease Section, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220.

ABSTRACT

Antigen detection methods may facilitate diagnosis of Giardia lamblia in stool specimens. As determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis and immunoblotting, G. lamblia cysts and trophozoites share several antigens, especially in the 65-kilodalton and 30- to 34-kilodalton regions. By using blind methods, we compared results obtained by counterimmunoelectrophoresis using cyst-immune rabbit serum and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using trophozoite-immune rabbit serum with results obtained by microscopic examination of a preserved, concentrated, and permanently stained stool specimen. Results were similar when these three methods were used to examine 118 stool specimens from clinical microbiology laboratories (53 specimens with G. lamblia) and specimens from 239 day-care-center toddlers (39 specimens with G. lamblia). Compared with microscopy, we found, for counterimmunoelectrophoresis and ELISA, respectively: sensitivity, 88 versus 94%; specificity, 97 versus 95%; positive predictive value, 86 versus 76%; negative predictive value, 98 versus 97%; and concordance, 89%. The false-positive rate by ELISA was 24% (10 of 42) in day-care-center toddlers but only 3% (1 of 32) in healthy adults (P less than 0.04) as corroborated by microscopy. This discrepancy suggests that the ELISA may be more sensitive than microscopy, which is considered the reference standard, and that results may be dependent, in part, on the epidemiology of the infection in the study subjects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hollm-Delgado, M.-G., Gilman, R. H., Bern, C., Cabrera, L., Sterling, C. R., Black, R. E., Checkley, W. (2008). Lack of an Adverse Effect of Giardia intestinalis Infection on the Health of Peruvian Children. Am J Epidemiol 168: 647-655 [Abstract] [Full Text]