JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dascal, A
Right arrow Articles by Mendelson, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dascal, A
Right arrow Articles by Mendelson, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 April; 27(4): 700-704

Diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection in a clinical setting by a direct antigen detection enzyme immunoassay kit.

A Dascal, J Chan-Thim, M Morahan, J Portnoy and J Mendelson

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

ABSTRACT

A commercial 4-h direct herpes simplex virus (HSV) antigen detection enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit (Du Pont Herpchek) was evaluated by using 273 clinical specimens obtained in a hospital-based infectious disease practice. The EIA was compared with a standard culture method in which WI38 cells were inoculated within 20 min of sample collection. Cultures were observed for 2 weeks, and positive findings were confirmed by fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibody (FA) staining. The values for the overall HSV detection rate were 40.7% by the standard culture method and 41.4% by EIA. In eight cases, the EIA was positive, while the culture method was negative; however, clinical data and confirmatory blocking EIA suggested that a true HSV infection was present. For six FA-confirmed, culture-positive samples, the direct EIA was negative; however, an EIA performed on the supernatants of these cultures was positive, suggesting that the failure of the EIA to detect these samples was not due to lack of strain specificity of the test. After confirmatory tests of standard culture and EIA discrepant results, the overall sensitivity of the test was 95.0% (113 of 119) and the specificity was 100% (154 of 154).


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 April; 27(4): 700-704




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.