JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, S A
Right arrow Articles by Wort, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, S A
Right arrow Articles by Wort, A J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 April; 27(4): 752-757

Evaluation of culture, immunofluorescence, and serology for the diagnosis of pertussis.

S A Halperin, R Bortolussi and A J Wort

Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Nasopharyngeal culture, direct immunofluorescence, and serology of acute-phase and paired serum specimens were compared for the laboratory diagnosis of infections due to Bordetella pertussis in a community-based pediatric population with both high vaccine usage and high pertussis incidence. In 77 (37%) of 210 patients evaluated, one or more tests were positive for pertussis. A clinical illness compatible with pertussis was present in 52 (71%) of 73 pertussis test-positive and 42 (35%) of 119 test-negative patients (P less than 0.001). Nasopharyngeal culture was of low sensitivity (20 [26%] of 77 positive tests) but was most commonly confirmed by another positive pertussis test (85%). Direct immunofluorescence was both insensitive and nonspecific; only 6 (30%) of 20 cases positive by culture were positive by immunofluorescence, and only 4 (33%) of 12 of the culture-negative, immunofluorescence-positive cases could be confirmed by another positive pertussis test. Although serology by enzyme immunoassay proved to be the most sensitive of the laboratory tests (87%), this sensitivity could be achieved only by assaying both acute-phase and paired serum specimens and measuring immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM antibodies to two pertussis antigens (pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin). Loss of sensitivity occurred with any reduction in the number of these serologic assays performed. Optimal laboratory diagnosis of endemic pertussis in a pediatric population requires both nasopharyngeal culture and serology by enzyme immunoassay.


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 April; 27(4): 752-757




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.