This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leland, D S Articles by French, M L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leland, D S Articles by French, M L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 June; 27(6): 1159-1162

Clinical experience with cytomegalovirus isolation using conventional cell cultures and early antigen detection in centrifugation-enhanced shell vial cultures.

Department of Pathology, Indiana University Medical Center, Riley Hospital, Indianapolis 46223.

ABSTRACT

A total of 1,915 clinical samples was inoculated by low-speed centrifugation into shell vials (Bartels Immunodiagnostics, Bellvue, Wash.) containing cover slip monolayers of MRC-5 fibroblasts. At 1 and 2 days postinoculation, one cover slip was stained by an indirect immunofluorescence technique using a monoclonal antibody (Biotech Research Laboratories for Dupont, Billerica, Mass.) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) early antigen (EA). Clinical samples were also inoculated into three MRC-5 or MRHF cell cultures which were observed for 30 days for the appearance of a cytopathic effect (CPE). Of 157 CMV-positive samples, 92 (59%) were identified by centrifugation-enhanced EA (CE-EA) and 131 (83%) produced a CPE. CE-EA was less sensitive than CPE for all types of samples, although 17% of CMV-positive samples were detected by CE-EA alone. Evaluation of the CMV status of patients with CE-EA-positive-CPE-negative samples indicated that these samples likely represented true CMV-positive results. The average elapsed time between culture inoculation and identification of CMV decreased as follows when both CE-EA and CPE, rather than CPE alone, were used: urines, 15 to 7 days; buffy coats, 18 to 9 days; lung samples, 13 to 8 days; throat samples, 18 to 7 days. Although CE-EA was less sensitive than 30-day cell culture, both CE-EA and CPE were identified as valuable in CMV detection, and neither could be discontinued without a decrease in the CMV isolation rate or an increase in the turnaround time.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Leland, D. S., Ginocchio, C. C. (2007). Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 49-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]