JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Correction for J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 (6) 1487-1488.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paya, C V
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paya, C V
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R L

Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 July; 27(7): 1431-1433

Limited usefulness of quantitative culture of blood drawn through the device for diagnosis of intravascular-device-related bacteremia.

C V Paya, L Guerra, H M Marsh, M B Farnell, J Washington 2nd and R L Thompson

Division of Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

ABSTRACT

The use of a differential quantitative blood culture technique (Isolator) to diagnose intravascular-device-related bacteremia (IDRB) was studied prospectively. During septic episodes in 44 patients, blood was obtained simultaneously through the suspected infected device and from a peripheral venipuncture. The blood samples were processed by the Isolator technique, which enables easy quantification of microorganisms. The cannula was removed, and its tip was cultured semiquantitatively. Of the 52 cannulas studied, 15 were the cause of IDRB, but only 7 of these showed a significantly higher bacterial count in blood obtained through the device compared with peripheral blood. The bacterial count was higher in blood drawn through the device than in peripheral blood in four of six cases that did not fulfill the definition of IDRB. Some blood cultures obtained through the device were positive despite negative cultures of peripheral blood and cannula tips (six cannulas). Quantitative blood cultures were not useful in diagnosing IDRB in this study.


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 July; 27(7): 1431-1433




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.