JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Correction for Sautter and Wells, J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 (10) 2380-2381.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cookson, B
Right arrow Articles by Noble, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cookson, B
Right arrow Articles by Noble, W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 July; 27(7): 1471-1476

Staff carriage of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

B Cookson, B Peters, M Webster, I Phillips, M Rahman and W Noble

Division of Microbiology, UMDS, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, England.

ABSTRACT

Twenty-six nurses were repeatedly screened for carriage of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA) immediately before and after duty periods in which they solely attended six patients widely colonized with two EMRSA strains distinguishable by plasmid analysis. EMRSA carriage was detected in 13 nurses. Three EMRSA carriage patterns emerged: transient carriage in 12 nurses, when the EMRSA was isolated from noses or fingers of nurses after duty but was gone before their next day's duty; short-term nasal carriage, seen on occasion in 4 of these 12 nurses, when EMRSA carriage was detected on two consecutive screens; and persistent nasal carriage, seen in 1 nurse only, when the EMRSA was seen on more than two consecutive occasions. All but one of these incidents of carriage could be explained by close patient, rather than environmental, exposure and occurred despite an intensive control programme. Transient or short-term carriage in nurses probably resulted in transfer of the EMRSA between patients. Staff decontamination should be considered following a period of cohort nursing of EMRSA patients, especially if staff members are shortly to nurse unaffected patients. Our findings may explain some of the difficulties in controlling EMRSA.


J Clin Microbiol. 1989 July; 27(7): 1471-1476




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.