This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maniar, A C Articles by Hammond, G W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maniar, A C Articles by Hammond, G W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 January; 28(1): 134-135

Detection of verotoxin in stool specimens.

Cadham Provincial Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

ABSTRACT

A total of 132 fecal specimens containing verotoxin (VT) were subjected to counter-current immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). Of these, 113 (85.6%) were found to be positive by CIE. Another 71 stool specimens containing E. coli serogroup O157 but with flagellar antigens other than H7 were tested for verotoxin by CIE. These stool specimens were negative for VT on Vero cell monolayers. Of these 71 stool specimens, 6 (8.5%) gave positive tests for verotoxin by CIE. Forty stool specimen filtrates which were negative for VT (negative controls) were also subjected to CIE. One of these stool specimen filtrates gave a line of precipitation by CIE. The specificity of the CIE test was 93.7%, and the sensitivity was 85.6%. False-positive results may have been due to an antibody component against the somatic antigen (O157) in the antitoxin used; this is a limitation of the CIE test. In a related evaluation, 302 stool specimen filtrates containing VT were retested with Vero cell suspension cultures in microdilution plates. Of these, 281 stool specimen filtrates showed cytotoxic effects within 24 h, while the remaining 21 filtrates showed the effects within 48 h. The use of Vero cell suspension culture is as reliable as the use of Vero cell monolayers and provides detection of verotoxin 24 to 48 h sooner.