JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, S L
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, C S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, S L
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, C S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 November; 28(11): 2394-2397

Evaluation of direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, centrifugation culture, and conventional culture for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus.

S L Johnston and C S Siegel

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Bellin Memorial Hospital, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54305.

ABSTRACT

Four methods of detecting respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from clinical specimens were evaluated. A total of 410 specimens consisting of nasopharyngeal washes, aspirates, and swabs were simultaneously tested for the presence of RSV by direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Kallestad Pathfinder), shell vial centrifugation culture (SVC), and conventional culture. DFA identified 146 (83%) of the 175 positive cases, EIA detected 153 (87%), SVC detected 127 (73%), and conventional culture detected 70 (40%). Conventional culture isolated an additional 19 respiratory viruses other than RSV. DFA and EIA were able to detect nonviable virus not isolated by a culture method, and SVC isolated low-titer virus not detected by conventional culture. DFA and EIA gave similar results; however, the EIA system was less dependent on technical expertise. The use of SVC enhanced the conventional culture system with 63 RSV isolates not recovered from the tube culture. We recommend complementary use of both culture and nonculture methods in the detection of RSV.


J Clin Microbiol. 1990 November; 28(11): 2394-2397




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.