This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwebke, J R Articles by Handsfield, H H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schwebke, J R Articles by Handsfield, H H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 November; 28(11): 2473-2476

Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

ABSTRACT

Endocervical infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis remain difficult to diagnose due to the lack of an inexpensive, rapid, and accurate test. We evaluated an alternative strategy for diagnosis in which initial screening was performed with an enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) followed by a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test on specimens in which the Chlamydiazyme optical density (OD) reading fell in an intermediate zone. Lowering the Chlamydiazme OD ratio (specimen to control) used to define a positive test from 1.0 (the ratio suggested by the manufacturer) to 0.3 raised the sensitivity of Chlamydiazyme from 73 to 83%. Confirmation of those specimens having OD ratios of 0.3 to 0.99 by DFA testing increased the specificity of Chlamydiazyme from 95 to 100%. This strategy necessitated performance of the DFA test on 5% of the specimens. Lowering the cutoff OD ratio below 0.3 increased the sensitivity even further but required DFA testing on greater than 25% of the specimens. Use of an adjusted positive cutoff value for defining positive enzyme immunoassays followed by DFA confirmation for intermediate-zone readings may be a feasible approach for some laboratories that lack cell culture facilities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Jespersen, D. J., Flatten, K. S., Jones, M. F., Smith, T. F. (2005). Prospective Comparison of Cell Cultures and Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5324-5326 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Newhall, W. J., Johnson, R. E., DeLisle, S., Fine, D., Hadgu, A., Matsuda, B., Osmond, D., Campbell, J., Stamm, W. E. (1999). Head-to-Head Evaluation of Five Chlamydia Tests Relative to a Quality-Assured Culture Standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 681-685 [Abstract] [Full Text]