This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, J A
Right arrow Articles by Levisky, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, J A
Right arrow Articles by Levisky, J S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 June; 28(6): 1108-1113

Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

J A Kellogg, J W Seiple, C L Murray and J S Levisky

Pathology Department, York Hospital, Pennsylvania 17405.

ABSTRACT

Duplicate endocervical swabs were collected from 1,675 patients to assess the effects of variations in specimen quality on Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories) detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and the incidence of false-positive results. One swab (at random) from each patient was tested for C. trachomatis antigen by using the standard Chlamydiazyme procedure. A 200-microliter volume of 0.9% saline was added to the other swab from each patient. After vortexing, 20 microliters was smeared on a slide for Papanicolaou (Pap) staining and the remaining specimen was then tested with the Chlamydiazyme assay. The Chlamydiazyme result was positive for 170 (10.1%) and 165 (9.8%) of the stained and unstained duplicate specimens, respectively (no significant difference). Pap stains on smears from 1,536 (91.7%) of the patients were analyzed, and endocervical and/or metaplastic (E-M) cells were detected in 789 (51.4%) smears. Of these 1,536 stained and analyzed specimens, 150 (9.8%) were Chlamydiazyme positive but only 132 (88.0%) of the positive results were confirmed by repeating the test and using a monoclonal blocking antibody (Abbott). Confirmed Chlamydiazyme-positive results were obtained from only 34 (4.6%) of 747 specimens lacking E-M cells but from 98 (12.4%) of 789 specimens containing the cells (P less than 0.001). Of the 150 initially Chlamydiazyme-positive results obtained with Pap-stained, analyzed specimens, 12 (26.1%) of 46 were falsely positive from specimens lacking E-M cells but only 6 (5.8%) of 104 were falsely positive from specimens containing E-M cells (P less than 0.01). C. trachomatis antigen was detected significantly more frequently and false-positive results were significantly less common from specimens in which E-M cells were detected.


J Clin Microbiol. 1990 June; 28(6): 1108-1113




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rogers, C. K., Wood, B. J., Rizzo, P., Gaydos, C. A. (2006). Effect of Endocervical-Specimen Adequacy on Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the APTIMA COMBO 2 Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4564-4565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chernesky, M., Castriciano, S., Jang, D., Smieja, M. (2006). Use of Flocked Swabs and a Universal Transport Medium To Enhance Molecular Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1084-1086 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Loeffelholz, M. J., Jirsa, S. J., Teske, R. K., Woods, J. N. (2001). Effect of Endocervical Specimen Adequacy on Ligase Chain Reaction Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3838-3841 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Newhall, W. J., Johnson, R. E., DeLisle, S., Fine, D., Hadgu, A., Matsuda, B., Osmond, D., Campbell, J., Stamm, W. E. (1999). Head-to-Head Evaluation of Five Chlamydia Tests Relative to a Quality-Assured Culture Standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 681-685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hillis, S. D., Wasserheit, J. N. (1996). Screening for Chlamydia -- A Key to the Prevention of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. NEJM 334: 1399-1401 [Full Text]  
  • Kellogg, J. A., Vanderhoff, B. T., Seiple, J. W., Hick, M. E. (1994). Comparison of First-Voided Urine Specimens With Endocervical Swab Specimens for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Women. Arch Fam Med 3: 672-675 [Abstract]