JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaydos, C A
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, T C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaydos, C A
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, T C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 July; 28(7): 1541-1544

Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

C A Gaydos, C A Reichart, J M Long, L E Welsh, T M Neumann, E W Hook 3rd and T C Quinn

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

ABSTRACT

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection was evaluated by culture and a new Syva enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 1,012 patients at two Baltimore, Md., sexually transmitted disease clinics. The overall chlamydia prevalence determined by culture was 12%. For 506 fresh cervical and urethral specimens, the sensitivity of Syva EIA was 90% and its specificity was 94% compared with culture. Discordant Syva EIA results were further evaluated by staining the sediment in centrifuged culture transport media and Syva EIA transport tubes with a fluorescent monoclonal antibody to C. trachomatis to detect elementary bodies. Reanalysis of the data after use of this technique to resolve discordant results increased sensitivity and specificity to 92 and 96%, respectively. A subsample of 307 fresh cervical specimens was also tested in a three-way comparison using Abbott Chlamydiazyme, Syva EIA, and culture. In this sample, compared with culture, the sensitivity and specificity of Syva EIA were 87 and 95%, respectively, and for Chlamydiazyme they were 77 and 98%, respectively. Syva EIA is a 4-h, easy-to-perform enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which has a high sensitivity with fresh genital specimens and offers an excellent alternative to culture.


J Clin Microbiol. 1990 July; 28(7): 1541-1544




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.