JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Citron, D M
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Citron, D M
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E J
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 October; 29(10): 2197-2203

Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

D M Citron, M I Ostovari, A Karlsson and E J Goldstein

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center, California 90404.

ABSTRACT

The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 October; 29(10): 2197-2203




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.