JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roslansky, P F
Right arrow Articles by Novitsky, T J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roslansky, P F
Right arrow Articles by Novitsky, T J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 November; 29(11): 2477-2483

Sensitivity of Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) to LAL-reactive glucans.

P F Roslansky and T J Novitsky

Associates of Cape Cod, Inc., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543.

ABSTRACT

The sensitivity of Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) to LAL-reactive glucans (LRGs) and lipid A was tested by using commercially available and experimentally formulated LAL reagents. The glucans included two kinds of beta-(1,3)-D-glucans, laminarin and curdlan, and cellulosic material, LAL-reactive material (LAL-RM), extracted from a hollow-fiber (Cuprophan) hemodialyzer. LAL-RM loses its LAL activity when it is digested with cellulase and thus appears to be a beta-(1,4)-D-glucan or a mixed glucan containing a substantial proportion of beta-(1,4) linkages. All LAL reagents tested were at least 1,000-fold more sensitive to endotoxin than to LRGs. The presence of the surfactant Zwittergent was shown to interfere with reactivity to LRGs; LAL reagents without added Zwittergent reacted more strongly to LRGs than did the same reagents containing Zwittergent. Chloroform extraction of LAL increased the reagents' sensitivity to both endotoxin and LRGs, but it was not responsible for LRG reactivity. The addition of Zwittergent significantly reduced the sensitivity of LAL reagents to lipid A. LAL without the surfactant was equally sensitive to endotoxin and lipid A. Both curdlan and LAL-RM amplified or enhanced the LAL response to endotoxin. Kinetic turbidimetric studies demonstrated that the enhancement was dependent on the glucan concentration.


J Clin Microbiol. 1991 November; 29(11): 2477-2483




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.