This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yechouron, A Articles by Mendelson, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yechouron, A Articles by Mendelson, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 December; 29(12): 2758-2762

Ability of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards-recommended quality control strains from the American Type Culture Collection to detect errors in disk diffusion susceptibility tests.

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

ABSTRACT

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommends, as a quality control for the disk diffusion susceptibility test, the use of three strains from the American Type Culture Collection: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. This study assesses the capacity of these strains to detect errors in the overall method. ATCC strains were tested by comparing testing by the standard NCCLS-recommended procedure (ST) with testing under the following conditions: incubation at 25 degrees C, Mueller-Hinton agar depths of 2 mm (AD2) and 8 mm (AD8), agar pHs of 6.5 and 8, inocula with McFarland standards of 0.25 (0.25M) and 4.0 McFarland (4.0M), direct inoculation without preincubation of inoculum (DI), and a 2-h delay between inoculation and disk application (2HR). The frequency of zone measurements outside the NCCLS-recommended control zone limits were as follows: ST, 0%; AD2, 18%; AD8, 9.6%; pH 6.5, 7.9%; pH 8, 5.3%; 0.25M, 3.5%; 4.0M, 24%; DI, 3.4%; 2HR, 1.8%; 25 degrees C (only E. coli and P. aeruginosa were evaluable), 28%. These results suggest that the quality control strains are only partially effective in detecting single extreme laboratory errors and that careful laboratory supervision is necessary even in the setting of properly monitored quality control strains.