JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Correction for Goossens and Butzler, J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 (11) 2681-2682.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Endtz, H P
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, R P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Endtz, H P
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, R P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May; 29(5): 1007-1010

Comparison of six media, including a semisolid agar, for the isolation of various Campylobacter species from stool specimens.

H P Endtz, G J Ruijs, A H Zwinderman, T van der Reijden, M Biever and R P Mouton

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

A recently described semisolid blood-free selective motility medium (SSM) (J. Goossens, L. Vlaes, I. Galand, C. Van den Borre, and J. P. Butzler, J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:1077-1080, 1989) was compared with two charcoal-based selective media (charcoal-based selective medium [CSM] and modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar [CCDA]), two blood-based media (Skirrow medium [SKM] and CampyBAP), and a passive, 0.65-microns-pore-size cellulose acetate membrane filter technique for the recovery of campylobacters from stools of patients with diarrhea. A total of 1,980 specimens were tested, 161 of which were found to be positive for campylobacters. Campylobacter jejuni was isolated in 148 specimens (91.9%), C. coli was isolated in 27 (7.5%), and "C. upsaliensis" was isolated in 1 (0.6%). After 72 h of incubation with a single medium, the cumulative percentages of Campylobacter-positive specimens isolated on CSM, CCDA, SKM, and SSM were 87, 83, 80, and 72%, respectively. The filter method alone enabled us to recover 61% of all campylobacters. The "C. upsaliensis" strain was isolated by this method only. The highest isolation rates were observed when two media, including CSM, were combined. The combination of CSM and SSM yielded the highest rates (96%), but these were not statistically different from the rates observed with combinations of CSM and SKM (94%) or of CSM and the filter method (91%). Extending the incubation time from 48 to 72 h led to an increase in the isolation rate regardless of the medium used (P less than 0.001). CSM and CCDA were the most selective media. SKM and CampyBAP appeared to be the most inhibitory media for the isolation of C. coli.


J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May; 29(5): 1007-1010




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.