This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hill, G B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hill, G B

Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

ABSTRACT

More efficient and reproducible alternative methods of performing agar dilution susceptibility testing are desirable, particularly for anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes generally grow more reliably on solid media than they do in broth microdilution wells. A new method, the revised spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method, was evaluated against the standard agar dilution (SAD) method by using a wide variety of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (161 strains) and eight antimicrobial agents. For the SGE method, a spiral plater was used to set up a concentration gradient of an antimicrobial agent within an agar plate across which bacterial strains were inoculated as radial streaks. After incubation, the MIC of the antimicrobial agent was calculated from the radial endpoint location where bacterial growth ceased along the streak. The MICs for 90% of strains tested (in micrograms per milliliter) and the cumulative percentages of susceptible strains at the breakpoints for the SGE and SAD methods, respectively, and for all 161 strains were as follows: for metronidazole, 2 and 100 versus 2 and 100; for imipenem, 1 and 99 versus 0.5 and 98; for ampicillin-sulbactam, 8 and 97 versus 8 and 98; for clindamycin, 4 and 90 versus 4 and 91; for cefoxitin, 32 and 95 versus 32 and 95; for mezlocillin, 256 and 88 versus greater than 128 and 86; for ampicillin, greater than or equal to 256 and 51 versus greater than 64 and 51; and for penicillin (in units per milliliter), greater than or equal to 512 and 71 versus greater than 64 and 65. The excellent agreement of these data and the greater sensitivity reproducibility, and efficiency of the revised SGE method warrant further evaluations. Assuming that these advantages are confirmed, the revised SGE method should be a useful alternative test method when detailed susceptibility data are desired.