JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espinel-Ingroff, A
Right arrow Articles by Shadomy, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espinel-Ingroff, A
Right arrow Articles by Shadomy, S

Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 June; 29(6): 1089-1094

Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

A Espinel-Ingroff, T M Kerkering, P R Goldson and S Shadomy

Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0049.

ABSTRACT

An evaluation of broth dilution antifungal susceptibility tests was performed by determining both the micro- and macrodilution MICs of amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and cilofungin against 38 isolates of Candida albicans, Candida lusitaniae, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. The following preliminary antifungal working group recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for broth macrodilution tests with antifungal agents were used: inocula standardized to 1 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(4) CFU/ml with a spectrophotometer, RPMI 1640 medium buffered with morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (pH 7.0), incubation at 35 degrees C for 24 to 48 h, and an additive drug dilution procedure. Broth microdilution MICs were higher (two or more dilutions) than broth macrodilution MICs for all isolates tested with amphotericin B and for most isolates tested with ketoconazole, fluconazole, and cilofungin. MICs of flucytosine were the same by both techniques or lower by the broth microdilution test except in tests with C. neoformans. However, the only statistically significant differences between the two tests were observed with amphotericin B against all isolates (P = 0.01 to 0.07), ketoconazole against C. neoformans (P = 0.01 to 0.02), and cilofungin against C. albicans (P = 0.05 to 0.14). Tests performed with less dense inocula (1 x 10(3) to 5 x 10(3] produced similar results.

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 June; 29(6): 1089-1094




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.