This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfaller, M A Articles by Rhoden, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfaller, M A Articles by Rhoden, D

Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Iowa City Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Iowa.

ABSTRACT

The autoSCAN-W/A (W/A; Baxter MicroScan, West Sacramento, Calif.) with the new fluorometric Rapid Neg Combo 1 (RNC) panel is a fully automated fluorometric system for identification of both enteric and nonenteric gram-negative bacilli within 2 h. We compared the W/A with the Vitek AutoMicrobic System (Vitek AMS; Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) for identification of 383 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli. The API 20E (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) and conventional biochemical testing were used as the reference systems. The W/A correctly identified 336 isolates (87.7%) to the species level and classified an additional 29 isolates (7.6%) as correct with low probability (overall identification = 95.3%); the Vitek AMS correctly identified 355 isolates (92.7%) to the species level and classified an additional 8 isolates (2.1%) as correct with low probability (overall identification = 94.8%). A common set of 134 isolates of gram-negative bacilli was tested in both participating laboratories as a means of assessing interlaboratory agreement with both the W/A and the Vitek AMS. The overall agreements between the two laboratories were 86% with the W/A and 92% with the Vitek AMS. The W/A performed comparably to the Vitek AMS for identification of most gram-negative bacilli, actually exceeding the Vitek AMS for identification of nonenteric bacilli. Rapid time to identification and a high level of automation make the W/A an attractive system for clinical microbiology laboratories.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Donay, J.-L., Mathieu, D., Fernandes, P., Pregermain, C., Bruel, P., Wargnier, A., Casin, I., Weill, F. X., Lagrange, P. H., Herrmann, J. L. (2004). Evaluation of the Automated Phoenix System for Potential Routine Use in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1542-1546 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Leclercq, A., Lambert, B., Pierard, D., Mahillon, J. (2001). Particular Biochemical Profiles for Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates on the ID 32E System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1161-1164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sung, L. L., Yang, D. I., Hung, C. C., Ho, H. T. (2000). Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A and the Vitek GNI+ AutoMicrobic System for Identification of Non-Glucose-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 1127-1130 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Odumeru, J. A., Steele, M., Fruhner, L., Larkin, C., Jiang, J., Mann, E., McNab, W. B. (1999). Evaluation of Accuracy and Repeatability of Identification of Food-Borne Pathogens by Automated Bacterial Identification Systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 944-949 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Funke, G., Monnet, D., deBernardis, C., von Graevenitz, A., Freney, J. (1998). Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Rapid Identification of Medically Relevant Gram-Negative Rods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1948-1952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Denton, M., Kerr, K. G. (1998). Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Infection Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11: 57-80 [Abstract] [Full Text]