JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osterhout, G J
Right arrow Articles by Dick, J D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osterhout, G J
Right arrow Articles by Dick, J D
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 September; 29(9): 1822-1830

Identification of clinical isolates of gram-negative nonfermentative bacteria by an automated cellular fatty acid identification system.

G J Osterhout, V H Shull and J D Dick

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

ABSTRACT

An automated cellular fatty acid (CFA) bacterial identification system, Microbial Identification System (MIS; Microbial ID, Newark, Del.), was compared with a conventional system for the identification of 573 strains of gram-negative nonfermentative bacteria. MIS identifications were based exclusively on the CFA composition following 22 to 26 h of growth at 28 degrees C on Trypticase soy agar. MIS identifications were listed with a confidence measurement (similarity index [SI]) on a scale of 0 to 1.0. A value of greater than or equal to 0.5 was considered a good match. The MIS correctly listed as the first choice 478 of 532 (90%) strains contained in the data base. However, only 314 (59%) had SI values of greater than or equal to 0.5. Of the 54 strains in which there was not agreement, 37 belonged to the genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, or Alcaligenes or were Pseudomonas pickettii. Reproducibility studies suggest that SI variation is most likely a function of a difference in culture age at the time of analysis, which is due to the relatively low temperature and time of incubation. Other discrepancies were attributable to insufficiently characterized library entries or an inability to differentiate chemotaxonomically closely related species. The MIS, as the first automated CFA identification system, is an accurate, efficient, and relatively rapid method for the identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacteria. The development of a CFA library with the media and incubation conditions routinely used for the isolation of clinical pathogens could further decrease the identification time and provide an increase in accuracy.

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 September; 29(9): 1822-1830




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.