This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swenson, J M Articles by Tenover, F C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swenson, J M Articles by Tenover, F C

New vancomycin disk diffusion breakpoints for enterococci. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Working Group on Enterococci.

Antimicrobial Resistance Section, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

ABSTRACT

Since 1988, when the first vancomycin-resistant enterococcus was described, several descriptions of failures of disk diffusion breakpoints to detect low-level vancomycin resistance (MICs, 8 to 32 micrograms/ml) have been published. A four-laboratory collaborative study was undertaken to establish more accurate breakpoints for the disk test. Mueller-Hinton agar was used to perform dilution testing (in three laboratories) and disk diffusion testing (in all laboratories). Results were determined at 18, 24, and 48 h, and zones of inhibition were read using both transmitted and reflected light. One hundred organisms (35 Enterococcus faecalis, 55 E. faecium, and 10 E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus isolates) were selected to represent vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant phenotypes. Interlaboratory agreement of agar dilution MICs was better at 24 h (91 to 94% within +/- 1 dilution) than at 18 h (76% within +/- 1 dilution). Therefore, 24-h agar dilution MIC results were used as the reference. For disk diffusion, it was critical to note the presence of a haze or colonies inside the zone when interpreting the test, since this correlated better with the results of the agar dilution test. The presence of a haze or inner colonies was best detected by reading the zones with transmitted light and incubating the plates for a full 24 h. When plotted against 24-h agar dilution MICs, breakpoints of </= 14 mm (resistant), 15 to 16 mm (intermediate), and >/= 17 mm (susceptible) resulted in 58 minor errors (14.5% of total values) and 5 very major errors (2.2% of resistant values or 1.3% of total values). No major errors were seen. Results of repeat testing using a common lot of Mueller-Hinton agar showed 52 minor errors (13.3%) and 4 major errors (4.2% of susceptible values of 1.0% pf total values) but no very major errors. It is recommended that any haze or colonies within the zone be taken into account when determining zones of inhibition and that an MIC test be performed for strains with intermediate zones if vancomycin is being considered for treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cetinkaya, Y., Falk, P., Mayhall, C. G. (2000). Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 686-707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Suppola, J. P., Kolho, E., Salmenlinna, S., Tarkka, E., Vuopio-Varkila, J., Vaara, M. (1999). vanA and vanB Incorporate into an Endemic Ampicillin-Resistant Vancomycin-Sensitive Enterococcus faecium Strain: Effect on Interpretation of Clonality. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3934-3939 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patel, R., Piper, K. E., Rouse, M. S., Steckelberg, J. M., Uhl, J. R., Kohner, P., Hopkins, M. K., Cockerill, F. R. III, Kline, B. C. (1998). Determination of 16S rRNA Sequences of Enterococci and Application to Species Identification of Nonmotile Enterococcus gallinarum Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 3399-3407 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Endtz, H. P., Van Den Braak, N., Van Belkum, A., Goessens, W. H., Kreft, D., Stroebel, A. B., Verbrugh, H. A. (1998). Comparison of Eight Methods To Detect Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 592-594 [Abstract] [Full Text]