JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerner-Smidt, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerner-Smidt, P
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 October; 30(10): 2680-2685

Ribotyping of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex.

P Gerner-Smidt

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

ABSTRACT

The Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex consists of four genotypically distinct but phenotypically very similar bacterial species or DNA groups: A. calcoaceticus (DNA group 1), A. baumannii (DNA group 2), unnamed DNA group 3 (P. J. M. Bouvet and P. A. D. Grimont, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:228-240, 1986), and unnamed DNA group 13 (I. Tjernberg and J. Ursing, APMIS 97:595-605, 1989). Because strains in this complex cause nosocomial outbreaks, it is important to be able to identify them as completely as possible. Ribotyping could provide such identification. Therefore, ribotyping was done on 70 strains in the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex with known DNA group affiliations by use of restriction enzymes EcoRI, ClaI, and SalI. A nonradioactive digoxigenin-11-dUTP-labeled Escherichia coli rRNA-derived probe was used. With any of the three restriction enzymes, banding patterns that were specific for each DNA group were seen. All 70 strains showed banding patterns that could identify them to the correct DNA group by use of any two of the three enzymes. In addition, banding patterns that could separate strains within any one DNA group were present. The discriminatory index of P. Hunter and M. Gaston (J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:2465-2466, 1988), applied to all strains with the combined results obtained with all three enzymes, revealed a value of 0.99. For strains in each DNA group, the value varied from 0.93 to 0.98. These results indicate the high discriminatory power of the system when used for epidemiological typing.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 October; 30(10): 2680-2685




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.