JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghannoum, M A
Right arrow Articles by Criddle, R S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghannoum, M A
Right arrow Articles by Criddle, R S
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2881-2886

Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique.

M A Ghannoum, A S Ibrahim, Y Fu, M C Shafiq, J E Edwards Jr and R S Criddle

Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90509.

ABSTRACT

We studied a series of test conditions in a microtiter system to define the optimal method for determining the susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans to antifungal agents. Twenty-one isolates of C. neoformans were grown for 24 or 48 h in four chemically defined media: yeast nitrogen base (BYNB 7); RPMI 1640; synthetic amino acid medium--fungal (SAAMF), buffered at pH 7.0 to select the medium that best supported growth of this fastidious yeast; and yeast nitrogen base, pH 5.4 (YNB 5.4). Maximum growth of C. neoformans, at 35 degrees C, was obtained in YNB 5.4, with the next highest growth levels in BYNB 7, SAAMF, and RPMI. Growth at 24 h was uniformly poor in all media and lacked reproducibility. In contrast, incubation for 48 h gave adequate growth with low standard deviations, and 48 h was selected as the optimal incubation period for this study. Comparison of the relationship between growth kinetics and initial inoculum size for eight cryptococcal isolates showed that 10(4) cells per ml yielded optimal growth in BYNB 7 and YNB 5.4, whereas 10(5) cells per ml was optimal in RPMI and SAAMF. Furthermore, variation of inocula from 10(3) to 10(5) cells per ml showed small but significant inoculum effects in determining MICs of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine for C. neoformans. Therefore, 10(4) cells per ml was chosen as the optimal inoculum for susceptibility testing in this study. Mean MICs of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine for 21 crytococcal isolates in RPMI and BYNB 7 were low (for example, fluconazole had mean MICs of 1.2 and 1.3 micrograms/ml in RPMI and BYNB 7, respectively) and differed significantly from medium to medium. In contrast, the MICs obtained in SAAMF were significantly higher (e.g., fluconazole had a mean MIC of 2.2 micrograms/ml). Variance in MICs was large with fluconazole and flucytosine but small with amphotericin B, irrespective of the medium used. A microtiter system employing BYNB 7 as the medium, 48 h as the incubation period, and 10(4) cells per ml as the final inoculum is a simple, accurate, and reproducible method for the testing of C. neoformans susceptibility to fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine.

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2881-2886




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.