JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopson, D K
Right arrow Articles by Murray, P R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopson, D K
Right arrow Articles by Murray, P R
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2893-2895

Comparison of the Vitek Immunodiagnostic Assay System with three immunoassay systems for detection of cytomegalovirus-specific immunoglobulin G.

D K Hopson, A C Niles and P R Murray

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

ABSTRACT

The Vitek Immunodiagnostic Assay System (VIDAS; bioMerieux Vitek Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) was evaluated for its ability to detect anticytomegalovirus immunoglobulin G (IgG) and was compared with the following assay systems: Abbott IMx Cytomegalovirus IgG antibody assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.), Whittaker Cytomegelisa II IgG assay (Whittaker Bioproducts, Walkersville, Md.), and Whittaker FIAX Cytomegalovirus IgG assay (Whittaker Bioproducts). Samples were considered positive if at least two of three (IMx, Cytomegelisa II, and FIAX) comparative assays gave positive results; a sample was considered negative if at least two of the three assays were negative. Of the 199 clinical serum samples tested, 194 gave concordant results among the three comparative assays (145 were positive and 49 were negative). The VIDAS results with two samples were persistently equivocal and were therefore excluded from the comparison study. The overall agreement between VIDAS and the established standard was 98.5%. The VIDAS assay yielded one false-positive and two false-negative results. The intra- and interassay precision studies indicate that the VIDAS assay is suitable for clinical use. The VIDAS system is rapid, self-contained, and fully automated and would be useful for screening of cytomegalovirus immune status.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2893-2895







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.