This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by York, M K Articles by Fiss, E H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by York, M K Articles by Fiss, E H

Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative fermentative bacilli.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Moffitt Hospital, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0100.

ABSTRACT

The autoSCAN-Walk-Away (W/A) system for identification and susceptibility testing was evaluated for 400 gram-negative fermentative bacteria by using the API 20E (366 isolates) and/or tube biochemical tests as the reference identification system and a frozen microdilution MIC tray system for susceptibility testing. The W/A system performed well for identification of this group of organisms representing 14 genera and 30 species, showing a sensitivity of 96% and results available in 2 h. Of the 16 misidentifications, 6 were with Serratia liquefaciens. A total of 63 isolates (17%) required further tests to complete the identification, compared with 106 (29%) of the isolates which required additional tests for the API 20E identification. Approximately half (32) of the additional tests with the W/A system were required in order to separate Citrobacter diversus from C. amalonaticus. For susceptibility determinations, the W/A system demonstrated an overall agreement of 93% (4,102 determinations) with 40 major errors (0.98%). However, of the 906 resistant organism-drug combinations in the study, there were 115 very major errors, for a false-susceptibility rate of 12.7% of the resistance determinations. Among these very major errors, 80% occurred with piperacillin and the cephalosporins. The W/A system completed the MIC determinations in 7 h; however, the difficulty in detecting resistance with some antimicrobial agents limited the advantages of the rapid susceptibility testing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Leclercq, A., Lambert, B., Pierard, D., Mahillon, J. (2001). Particular Biochemical Profiles for Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates on the ID 32E System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1161-1164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• O'Hara, C. M., Brenner, F. W., Miller, J. M. (2000). Classification, Identification, and Clinical Significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 534-546 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cantón, R., Pérez-Vázquez, M., Oliver, A., Sánchez Del Saz, B., Gutiérrez, M. O., Martínez-Ferrer, M., Baquero, F. (2000). Evaluation of the Wider System, a New Computer-Assisted Image-Processing Device for Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 1339-1346 [Abstract] [Full Text]