JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyashita, N
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyashita, N
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, A
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2911-2916

Establishment of a particle-counting method for purified elementary bodies of chlamydiae and evaluation of sensitivities of the IDEIA Chlamydia kit and DNA probe by using the purified elementary bodies.

N Miyashita and A Matsumoto

Department of Microbiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the sensitivity of commercially available test kits for detection of chlamydiae, we established a method of purifying Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae elementary bodies (EBs). We then subjected the purified EBs, together with the purified EBs of Chlamydia psittaci, to the IDEIA Chlamydia (IDEIA) and DNA probe test kits to determine the EB numbers at the detection limits. The sensitivities of the test kits were thus compared. The results can be summarized as follows. (i) Intact EBs in the purified preparations were present at 100, 96.3, and 97% for the C. psittaci Cal 10, C. trachomatis L2/434/Bu (L2), and C. pneumoniae TW-183 strains, respectively. The preparations of the L2 and TW-183 EBs contained a few EB envelopes, which reacted with antilipopolysaccharide monoclonal antibodies, as did the intact EBs, indicating that elimination of EB envelopes is not required for testing of the IDEIA kit's sensitivity. (ii) We established a method of counting intact EBs and EB envelopes under a scanning electron microscope after sedimentation of EBs on a coverslip by centrifugation. (iii) The EB numbers per assay at the cutoff level, which is set up in the IDEIA kit, were 9.6 x 10(2), 6.5 x 10(3), and 2.5 x 10(4) for the L2, TW-183, and Cal 10 strains, respectively. When the same EB preparations were applied to the DNA probe kit, the EB number at the cutoff level was 7.5 x 10(3) per assay for the L2 strain, but no reaction occurred for the Cal 10 and TW-183 strains at any EB number, indicating that the DNA probe kit is highly specific for C. trachomatis. Although the IDEIA kit designed for detection of C. trachomatis showed a sensitivity superior to that of the DNA probe, the chlamydial species was not determined by the IDEIA kit.

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 November; 30(11): 2911-2916




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.