JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapin-Robertson, K
Right arrow Articles by Edberg, S C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapin-Robertson, K
Right arrow Articles by Edberg, S C
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 February; 30(2): 377-380

Clinical and laboratory analyses of cytospin-prepared Gram stains for recovery and diagnosis of bacteria from sterile body fluids.

K Chapin-Robertson, S E Dahlberg and S C Edberg

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Connecticut.

ABSTRACT

The smear of a clinical specimen provides essential laboratory information that is used to make therapeutic decisions. For this study, smears were made by centrifugation in a Beckman Microfuge 11 (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, Calif.) and in parallel by using a Cytospin 2 apparatus (Shandon Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa.). Of 350 consecutive body fluid specimens examined, 50 (14.0%) grew bacteria. Both methods were culture and smear positive for 24 (6.9%) specimens; 18 (5.1%) specimens were cytocentrifuge smear positive, culture positive, and high-speed centrifugation (HSC) negative; 3 (0.8%) were culture negative and positive by both smear methods; and 1 (0.2%) was HSC smear positive, culture positive, and cytocentrifuge negative. Seven (2.0%) specimens were culture positive and negative by both smear methods. Clinically, cytocentrifuge preparations showed greater sensitivity for culture-positive specimens and a closer correlation with the CFU per milliliter than HSC did, resulting in a greater ability to treat patients with specific therapies. In addition, analysts needed to examine only a 6-mm-diameter area on the slide, cells and microbes were somewhat larger and more regular in appearance, and smears stained more uniformly. Because of the increased clinical and laboratory utility of the cytocentrifuge, its use is recommended in clinical microbiology laboratories for all sterile body fluid specimens.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 February; 30(2): 377-380




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.