JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kraat, Y J
Right arrow Articles by Bruggeman, C A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kraat, Y J
Right arrow Articles by Bruggeman, C A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 February; 30(2): 522-524

Comparison of four techniques for detection of antibodies to cytomegalovirus.

Y J Kraat, R M Hendrix, M P Landini and C A Bruggeman

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Limburg, Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

Four serological methods were compared and evaluated for use in detecting cytomegalovirus antibody in blood and organ donors. Western blotting (immunoblotting), latex agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and a recent available microparticle enzyme immunosorbent assay were used. The microparticle enzyme immunoassay appears to compare favorably with each of the other three assays tested for screening blood and organ donors for a previous cytomegalovirus infection.

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 February; 30(2): 522-524






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.