JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, J A
Right arrow Articles by Levisky, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, J A
Right arrow Articles by Levisky, J S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 July; 30(7): 1711-1715

Efficacy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of urinary tract immunoglobulins for diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

J A Kellogg, J P Manzella, J W Seiple, S J Fortna, J W Cook and J S Levisky

Department of Medicine, York Hospital, Pennsylvania 17405.

ABSTRACT

Results of the Uristat test (Shield Diagnostics Ltd.), a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of urine antibodies to seven common bacterial pathogens, were compared with results of urine culture, urinalysis, and clinical history to determine the usefulness of Uristat in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Midstream, catheterized, and indwelling catheter urine specimens sent to the laboratory for culture were included in the study. Quantitative cultures were performed on both 5% sheep blood agar and eosin-methylene blue agar. Uristat ELISAs were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. By using a Bacillus subtilis bioassay technique, antibacterial activity was detected in the urine of 236 (22.2%) of 1,061 patients. Probable, possible, or asymptomatic UTIs were diagnosed for 258 (24.3%) of the 1,061 patients. Of those infections, 219 (84.9%) were caused by bacterial species whose antibodies were detectable by Uristat. Uristat's sensitivity and specificity were 76.7 and 56.0%, respectively. Uristat's predictive values of positive and negative results were 31.2 and 90.2%, respectively. Further development of the Uristat test is necessary before it can be of assistance in the diagnosis of UTIs.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 July; 30(7): 1711-1715




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.