JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozanne, G
Right arrow Articles by d'Halewyn, M A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozanne, G
Right arrow Articles by d'Halewyn, M A
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 July; 30(7): 1778-1782

Secondary immune response in a vaccinated population during a large measles epidemic.

G Ozanne and M A d'Halewyn

Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Immunodiagnostic, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada.

ABSTRACT

The rates of secondary immune response (SIR) and secondary vaccine failure (SVF) during a measles epidemic (10,184 notifications) were evaluated. A patient with SIR was defined as a subject for whom all sera were immunoglobulin G (IgG) positive and IgM negative with a significant increase in complement fixation titer. A patient with SVF was defined as a vaccinated symptomatic subject showing a SIR. Sequential sera from 898 subjects were tested for measles antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgG and IgM) and by complement fixation. Evidence of recent anti-measles virus specific immune response was found in 496 subjects (55.5%). The vaccination rate was estimated at 74.6% (99% confidence interval [CI], 67.9 to 80.7%). The number of exposed vaccinated subjects was estimated at 370 (74.6% of 496). The SIR rate was 4.03% (20 of 496) (99% CI, 2.1 to 6.9%) among subjects with immune response. These 20 subjects were 2 with measles (Centers for Disease Control's definition), 6 with measles with rash of unknown duration, 8 with presumed measles with either rash or fever, 3 asymptomatic subjects (2 with recent contact with a measles case), and 1 undocumented subject. Since 3 patients with SIR were asymptomatic and 2 others were documented as not vaccinated, there was a maximum of 15 probable occurrences of SVF among the 20 patients with SIR. The SVF rate among exposed vaccinated subjects was estimated at 4.05% (15 of 370) (99% CI, 1.9 to 7.5%). In conclusion, neither prior vaccination nor detectable SIR ensures protective immunity. Measles virus may induce asymptomatic SIR in IgG-seropositive subjects. SVF led to typical or modified measles but did not seem to have played an important role during this epidemic.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 July; 30(7): 1778-1782




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.